Iowa Youth Survey Iowa Department of Human Services Office of Drug Control Policy Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning Iowa Department of Education Iowa Department of Public Health Contact Us
Select a Report
Report by Year

2002 Decat Cluster Youth Survey Reports

Please click below to view the Youth Survey report for that area.
April 2007-A correction has been made to some of the 2002 Decat Cluster reports in Part IV Summary of Ever and Current Substance Use Prevalence Rates for any drug use current (page 47). Changes consist of a slight decrease (1% to 2%) from previously reported data for some of the categories; except for Decat 05 and Decat 16 which had decreases of 3% for 11th graders and Decat 33 which had a decrease of 4% for 11th graders. Corrected data are shown in red.
1 Adair-Adams-Union 21 Emmet-Kossuth-Palto Alto
2 Allamakee-Clayton-Howard-Winneshiek 22 Chickasaw-Floyd-Mitchell
3 Appanoose-Davis-Monroe 23 Fremont-Page-Taylor
4 Audubon-Carroll-Greene-Guthrie 24 Hamilton-Humboldt-Wright
5 Benton-Iowa 25 Harrison-Monona-Shelby
6 Black Hawk 26 Jasper-Poweshiek-Tama
7 Boone-Dallas 27 Jefferson-Keokuk-Van Buren-Washington
8 Bremer-Butler-Franklin-Grundy 28 Johnson
9 Buchanan-Delaware-Fayette 29 Jones
10 Buena Vista-Crawford-Sac 31 Linn
11 Calhoun-Pocahontas-Webster 32 Hardin-Marshall
12 Cass-Mills-Montgomery 33 Muscatine
13 Cedar 34 Polk
14 Cerro Gordo-Hancock-Winnebago-Worth 35 Pottawattamie
15 Cherokee-Lyon-Plymouth-Sioux 36 Scott
16 Clarke-Decatur-Lucas-Ringgold-Wayne 37 Story
17 Clay-Dickinson-O'Brien-Osceola 38 Mahaska-Wapello
18 Clinton-Jackson 39 Woodbury
19 Des Moines-Henry-Lee-Louisa 40 Madison-Marion-Warren
20 Dubuque  
Note: The county configuration of several Decat clusters has changed since the 1999 Youth Survey . The Decat clusters involved are Decat 3, Decat 5, Decat 16, Decat 19, Decat 26 and Decat 27 where one or more counties were added or eliminated, Decat 30 which was dissolved and the counties moved to other clusters, and Decat 40 which was newly created since 1999. Please keep this in mind if making comparisons between 2002 and 1999 reports.